Safety and clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke in pregnant patients: A systematic review
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Calisaya-Madariaga, Irving GabrielCarbajal-Galarza, Meiling
Castillo-Granda, Jhosely Ibeth
Abanto-Florez, Leonardo Marcelo
Navarro Salcedo, Maria Fernanda
Suárez Rodríguez, José Alejandro
Ramos Maguiña, Edward Sebastian
Meca-Bayona, Matias Daniel
Pacheco-Barrios, Niels
Acurio-Ortiz, Karlos
Issue Date
2026-01-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BMJ Publishing GroupJournal
Journal of Neurointerventional SurgeryDOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024431Abstract
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an established and guideline-endorsed treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase remains the first-line therapy within the approved time window, often used alone or as a bridging strategy before MT. However, both interventions have been systematically understudied in pregnant patients, as this population has been excluded from most pivotal clinical trials. This systematic review critically evaluates the procedural feasibility, safety, and maternal-fetal outcomes of MT in pregnant patients experiencing AIS. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science yielded 16 studies encompassing 26 cases. In 20 of these, the occlusions involved the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, with 58% receiving combined IVT and MT, and 42% undergoing MT alone. Successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) was attained in 84% of cases. The median times were 120 min from onset to hospital arrival, 92 min from arrival to puncture, and 330 min from onset to recanalization. Favorable maternal outcomes (mRS 0-1) were observed in 91% of cases at follow-up, and no direct MT-related fetal mortalities occurred. Radiological protection practices, though inconsistently reported, commonly included abdominal shielding and optimized fluoroscopic protocols. Despite limited high-level evidence, MT in pregnancy appears technically feasible and clinically beneficial, warranting prompt multidisciplinary coordination and robust imaging protocols. Future prospective research is essential to better define safety parameters and optimize guidelines for this vulnerable subgroup of patients.Type
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Rights
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecLanguage
engISSN
17598478EISSN
1759-8486ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024431
Scopus Count
Collections
