• English
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Artículos científicos
  • Pregrado
  • Seccion en procesamiento
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Artículos científicos
  • Pregrado
  • Seccion en procesamiento
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of UPCCommunitiesTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

Quick Guides

AcercaPolíticasPlantillas de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de otros documentosLista de verificación

Statistics

Display statistics

Guidelines for Adapting a Corruption Peruvian Survey into the Ecuadorian Context

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Freundt-Thurne, Úrsula
Bernal-Suarez, Juan David
Gallardo-Echenique, Eliana
Issue Date
2026-01-01
Keywords
Corruption
Expert judgment
Fraud
Transgression

Metadata
Show full item record
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Journal
Smart Innovation Systems and Technologies
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/689038
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09911-2_46
Abstract
This study aimed to adapt the “Corruption Normalization Scale”, created for, and applied among Peruvian university students, to the Ecuadorian university context. To achieve this, cultural, idiomatic, and linguistic particularities of the latter country were considered. This is a cross-cultural adaptation study, through content validation and expert judgment. Ten multidisciplinary experts from different areas of knowledge were chosen. The experts agree on the relevance of the four criteria evaluated: Sufficiency, Clarity, Coherence, and Relevance. The results showed that a group of experts found it difficult to delimit the scope of the three dimensions (Fraud, Criollada, and Transgression). It is recommended to contemplate the idiomatic particularities of each country or area where the Scale is to be applied, to clearly and correctly transmit what is to be evaluated.
Type
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Rights
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
Language
eng
ISSN
2190-3018
EISSN
2190-3026
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09911-2_46
Scopus Count
Collections
Seccion en procesamiento

entitlement

 

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Alicia
La Referencia
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.