Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValles-Coral, Miguel Angel
dc.contributor.authorPinedo, Lloy
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Ciro
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Diego
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Dávila, Keller
dc.contributor.authorArévalo-Fasanando, Lolita
dc.contributor.authorReátegui-Lozano, Nelly
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-07T21:22:46Z
dc.date.available2026-04-07T21:22:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fdata.2025.1678863
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/689023
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in cervical cytology has increased substantially due to the need for automated tools that support the early detection of precancerous lesions. Methods: This systematic review examined deep learning models applied to cervical cytology images, focusing on the architectures used, the datasets employed, and the performance metrics reported. Articles published between 2022 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus using PRISMA methodology. After applying inclusion criteria and full-text screening, 77 studies were included for RQ1 (models), 75 for RQ2 (datasets), and 71 for RQ3 (metrics). Results: Hybrid models were the most prevalent (56%), followed by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and a growing number of Vision Transformer (ViT)-based approaches. SIPaKMeD and Herlev were the most frequently used datasets, although the use of private datasets is increasing. Accuracy was the most commonly reported metric (mean 87.76%), followed by precision, recall, and F1-score. Several hybrid and ViT-based models exceeded 92% accuracy. Identified limitations included limited cross-validation, reduced clinical representativeness of datasets, and inconsistent diagnostic criteria. Discussion: This review synthesizes current trends in AI-based cervical cytology, highlights common methodological limitations, and proposes directions for future research to enhance clinical applicability and standardization.es_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isoenges_PE
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAes_PE
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_PE
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcanceres_PE
dc.subjectcervical cytologyes_PE
dc.subjectdatasetses_PE
dc.subjectdeep learninges_PE
dc.subjectmetricses_PE
dc.subjectmodelses_PE
dc.titleApplication of artificial intelligence in cervical cytology: a systematic review of deep learning models, datasets, and reported metricses_PE
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_PE
dc.identifier.eissn2624909X
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Big Dataes_PE
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.description.peerreviewRevisión por pareses_PE
dc.relation.isPartOfurn:issn:
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-105027658940
dc.identifier.scopusidSCOPUS_ID:105027658940
dc.source.journaltitleFrontiers in Big Data
dc.source.volume8
refterms.dateFOA2026-04-07T21:22:48Z
dc.identifier.isnihttps://isni.org/isni/000000012196144X
dc.identifier.rorhttps://ror.org/047xrr705


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fdata-8-1678863.pdf
Size:
2.702Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2