Application of artificial intelligence in cervical cytology: a systematic review of deep learning models, datasets, and reported metrics
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Valles-Coral, Miguel AngelPinedo, Lloy
Rodríguez, Ciro
Rodríguez, Diego
Sánchez-Dávila, Keller
Arévalo-Fasanando, Lolita
Reátegui-Lozano, Nelly
Issue Date
2026-01-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media SAJournal
Frontiers in Big DataDOI
10.3389/fdata.2025.1678863Abstract
Introduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in cervical cytology has increased substantially due to the need for automated tools that support the early detection of precancerous lesions. Methods: This systematic review examined deep learning models applied to cervical cytology images, focusing on the architectures used, the datasets employed, and the performance metrics reported. Articles published between 2022 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus using PRISMA methodology. After applying inclusion criteria and full-text screening, 77 studies were included for RQ1 (models), 75 for RQ2 (datasets), and 71 for RQ3 (metrics). Results: Hybrid models were the most prevalent (56%), followed by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and a growing number of Vision Transformer (ViT)-based approaches. SIPaKMeD and Herlev were the most frequently used datasets, although the use of private datasets is increasing. Accuracy was the most commonly reported metric (mean 87.76%), followed by precision, recall, and F1-score. Several hybrid and ViT-based models exceeded 92% accuracy. Identified limitations included limited cross-validation, reduced clinical representativeness of datasets, and inconsistent diagnostic criteria. Discussion: This review synthesizes current trends in AI-based cervical cytology, highlights common methodological limitations, and proposes directions for future research to enhance clinical applicability and standardization.Type
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Rights
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Language
engEISSN
2624909Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fdata.2025.1678863
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

