Comparison of Seismic Performance Levels of Five-Story Limited Ductility and Confined Masonry Structures, Lima, Perú
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Bendezu Romero, Lenin MiguelPabón, Deivy Hernández
Rufino, Yedsem Nuñez
Lazo, Malena Alessandra Serrano
Issue Date
2025-01-01Keywords
base shearconfined masonry walls
Estera 3D
limited ductility walls
Pushover analysis
seismic behavior
spectral displacement
structural performance
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Avestia PublishingJournal
International Conference on Civil Structural and Transportation EngineeringDOI
10.11159/iccste25.354Abstract
This study evaluates the seismic behavior of a five-story multifamily building by comparing two structural systems: Limited Ductility Walls (LDW) and Confined Masonry Walls (CMW). The structural models were developed using Estera 3D software, and the analysis was carried out exclusively through nonlinear static analysis (pushover). Four levels of seismic demand were considered: frequent, occasional, design, and maximum earthquakes. Both systems achieved the same structural performance levels according to code-based criteria: full operation for the frequent earthquake; operation with minor damage for the occasional and design earthquakes; and life safety for the maximum earthquake. However, quantitative results show better performance for the LDW system. For the design earthquake, the LDW system exhibited a maximum base shear of 1141.36 tons and a top-level displacement of 7.098 cm, while the CMW system reached 2371.63 tons and 2.9696 cm, respectively. In terms of spectral acceleration, LDW registered 935.20 gal compared to 1098 gal for CMW. For the maximum earthquake, the LDW system reached a displacement of 10.68 cm and a base shear of 1272.15 tons, whereas the CMW system reached 8.0686 cm and 2291.71 tons. These results indicate that, although both systems meet the established performance objectives, the LDW system demonstrates more efficient structural behavior and greater energy dissipation capacity under severe seismic events.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution 4.0 International
Language
engEISSN
23693002ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.11159/iccste25.354
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons

