The impact of 3D printing in orthopedics and traumatology: Mapping the research landscape through bibliometrics and visualized analysis
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2025-08-01Keywords
3D printingBibliometric analysis
Customized implants
Orthopedics
Research collaboration
Traumatology
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.Journal
Journal of OrthopaedicsDOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.030Abstract
Objective: This study conducts a bibliometric analysis to evaluate the research landscape of 3D printing in orthopedics and traumatology. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was performed on articles retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (Orthopedics category) up to 2024, using keywords related to “3D Printing” and “Additive Manufacturing.” After manual screening of 434 initial manuscripts, 412 publications were selected. Data analysis utilized the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer for network visualization, with manual data standardization. Results: The analysis identified 412 relevant publications, with a peak of 72 documents in 2023, an average document age of 3.95 years, and an annual growth rate of 41.86 %. The average number of citations per document was 14.92. China led in publication volume (210 articles) and total citations (2,264), followed by the United States (68 articles). Italy and Spain were noted for a high average number of citations per document. Among the most prolific authors were Minxun Lu, Yi Luo, Li Min, and Chongqi Tu. The Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (81 publications) and Orthopaedic Surgery (76 publications) were the journals with the most articles. Sichuan University was the leading institution (41 publications), followed by Southern Medical University (29) and Shanghai Jiao Tong University (19). Keyword analysis indicated a shift from terms like “hydrogels” and “template” (2019) to “osteogenesis,” "personalized," and “sarcoma” (2023), in addition to consistently important terms like “reconstruction,” "prosthesis," and “fixation.” Conclusions: 3D printing is a transformative technology in orthopedics, significantly enhancing preoperative planning and enabling patient-specific solutions. The marked increase in publications, particularly from Chinese institutions, highlights growing global interest. Evolving keyword trends suggest a move towards regenerative strategies and precision oncology. International collaboration is vital for continued innovation, and future research should focus on integrating technological advancements with clinical outcomes.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessLanguage
engEISSN
0972978Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.030
Scopus Count
Collections
