• English
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Artículos científicos
  • Pregrado
  • Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
  • Odontología
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Artículos científicos
  • Pregrado
  • Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
  • Odontología
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of UPCCommunitiesTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

Quick Guides

AcercaPolíticasPlantillas de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de otros documentosLista de verificación

Statistics

Display statistics

Adhesive Strength of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Posts with Silane Conditioning Versus Universal Adhesive System Conditioning: An In Vitro Study

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Martínez-Campos, Reynaldo
Vilchez-Reynaga, Luzmila
Santander-Rengifo, Flor
López-Gurreonero, Carlos
Aliaga-Mariñas, Ana
Aroste-Andía, Rosa
Cayo-Rojas, César
Issue Date
2024-01-01
Keywords
Adhesive Strength
Fiberglass Post
Push-out
Silane
Universal Adhesive
Universal Self-Adhesive Cement

Metadata
Show full item record
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Journal
Journal of International Oral Health
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/675846
DOI
10.4103/jioh.jioh_42_24
Abstract
Aim: The current study compared the push-out adhesive strength of glass fiber-reinforced posts with a silane-treated surface versus a universally adhesive-treated surface. In both cases, a universal self-adhesive cement was used. Materials and Methods: Thirty bovine teeth were used in an in vitro experiment. Through cutting, the root and coronal sections were divided. Subsequently, the manufacturer’s recommendations were followed for the placement of glass fiber-reinforced posts through root canal therapy, gutta-percha removal, and canal shaping. On the basis of how the posts were treated prior to cementation, the samples were split into three groups (n = 10). Posts in group A (control) did not get any prior treatment. Posts in group B had previously received a silane treatment. Posts in Group C had previously been coated with universal adhesive. Following the application of RelyX Ultimate universal self-adhesive cementation, the samples were segmented and subjected to a Push-Out test at a speed of 1 mm/min on a universal testing apparatus. Intergroup ANOVA was used to evaluate the adhesive strength means (measured in MPa), and Tukey’s post hoc test was performed afterward, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: Compared to the glass fiber-reinforced posts pre-treated with silane (P = 0.003) and the control group (P < 0.001), the adhesive strength of the posts pre-treated with universal adhesive was significantly higher. Similarly, the adhesive strength of the glass fiber-reinforced posts that had been pre-treated with silane was considerably higher than that of the control group (P = 0.012). Conclusion: Posts reinforced with glass fiber and pre-treated with universal adhesive exhibited notably greater adhesive strength compared to those pre-treated with silane. When compared to utilizing universal self-adhesive cement without pre-treatment, both pre-treatment techniques greatly increased the adhesive strength of glass fiber-reinforced posts.
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Language
eng
ISSN
09767428
EISSN
09761799
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.4103/jioh.jioh_42_24
Scopus Count
Collections
Odontología

entitlement

 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Sellado Dentinario Inmediato y Resin Coating como técnicas de protección dentinaria

    Tello Torres, Roberto; Noriega Castañeda, Jorge; Kawashima Matamoros, Luciana Sachie; Maestri Fernández-Concha, Renato Stefano (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), 2019-02-10)
    El objetivo de esta revisión fue recopilar información sobre las técnicas de Sellado Dentinario Inmediato (SDI) y Resin Coating (RC) como incremento de las fuerzas de adhesión. Asimismo, el siguiente trabajo describe las principales características de cada técnica, así como sus ventajas y desventajas.
    Acceso abierto
  • Thumbnail

    Microtensile Bond Strength and Failure Mode of Different Universal Adhesives on Human Dentin

    Santander-Rengifo, Flor; Carreras-Presas, Carmen Martin; Aroste-Andía, Rosa; Hernández-Huamaní, Emily; Gavilán-Chávez, Percy; Cervantes-Ganoza, Luis; Cayo-Rojas, César (Elsevier Inc., 2024-01-01)
    Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and failure mode of 4 different universal adhesive systems (UAs) on human dentin. Materials and methods: The study sectioned the occlusal thirds of 32 human third molars and divided them into 4 groups based on the adhesive system used. Group A: Palfique Universal Bond, Group B: Single Bond Universal, Group C: All-Bond Universal, and Group D: One Coat 7 Universal. The specimens underwent a 10,000-cycle thermocycling ageing process prior to testing (n = 32). Afterwards, 8 beams were obtained per group and subjected to µTBS testing using a digital universal testing machine at a speed of 1 mm/min. The microtensile bond strength values were analysed in Megapascals (MPa), and the failure mode was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Welch's parametric ANOVA with robust variance and the Games-Howell post hoc test were used for µTBS comparisons, and Fisher's exact test was used to determine the association between adhesive type and failure mode. The significance level was set at P < .05. Results: Group D showed a significantly higher µTBS than groups A (P < .001) and B (P < .001), but no significant difference was observed with group C (P= .075). Furthermore, groups B and C showed significantly higher µTBS than group A (P< .001 and P < .001, respectively), but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P = .132). Additionally, group A exhibited a significant association with an adhesive failure mode (P < .05), whereas groups B, C, and D were significantly associated with a mixed failure mode (P < .05). Conclusion: The One Coat 7 Universal adhesive system showed higher microtensile bond strength values and higher chemical interaction with dentin compared to Palfique Universal Bond and Single Bond Universal. However, no significant differences were observed compared to All-Bond Universal.
    Acceso abierto
  • Thumbnail

    Efectividad de un promotor de adherencia de mezclas asfálticas en caliente de comportamiento organosilánico nanotecnológico en el Km. 101+500 al Km. 153+500 de la carretera Moquegua- Omate- Arequipa

    Lazo Lazaro, Guillermo; Fretel Bravo, Flor Anabell; Rafael Baltazar, Lorena Geovanna (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)PE, 2024-09-16)
    La investigación se centró en desarrollar un estudio sobre la efectividad de la adherencia en las mezclas asfálticas en caliente que puede alcanzarse utilizando un innovador tipo de promotor de adherencia de naturaleza organosilánica nanotecnológica en el Km. 101+500 al Km. 153+500 de la carretera Moquegua- Omate- Arequipa. El nivel de la investigación es explicativo correlacional, presentando diseños experimentales probatorios. Se realizó una batería de ensayos utilizando 0.07% del promotor de adherencia respecto al peso del asfalto, fundamentado en lo recomendado por la tecnología organosilánica nanotecnológica. En primera instancia, se evaluó la adhesividad y/o adherencia en áridos sueltos. En términos de adhesividad en arenas, presentó un desprendimiento parcial de grado 2 y total de grado 7. Al incorporarle el promotor resultó un desprendimiento parcial de 5 y total de 9, evidenciando la mejora de la condición adherente. En el caso de los agregados gruesos, se visualizó que la adherencia resultó menor al 95% en el ensayo sin promotor, mientras que para el ensayo con promotor la adherencia mejora y supera el 95%. En segunda instancia, se analizó la resistencia a la tracción indirecta (ITS) en condición húmeda y seca. Sin promotor, se obtuvo un valor de 92.3Psi y 65.4Psi, y con la incorporación del promotor 130.1Psi y 106.5Psi, en condición seca y húmeda respectivamente. La mezcla sin promotor presentó finalmente un TSR de 70.9, en tanto que con el promotor presentó 81.9, obteniendo una efectividad de 13.4% más respecto a la mezcla sin promotor. Con ello, se muestra la eficiencia de contar con esta tecnología innovadora de acción con organosilanos en dimensiones nanotecnológicas y que garantiza la durabilidad en términos de adherencia.
    Acceso abierto

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Alicia
La Referencia
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.