Ultra-processed foods consumption and health-related outcomes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Aramburu, AdolfoAlvarado-Gamarra, Giancarlo
Cornejo, Rubelio
Curi-Quinto, Katherine
Díaz-Parra, Carmen del Pilar
Rojas-Limache, Gabriela
Lanata, Claudio F.
Issue Date
2024-01-01Keywords
dietfood consumption
non-communicable diseases
processed food
systematic review
ultra-processed foods
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media SAJournal
Frontiers in NutritionDOI
10.3389/fnut.2024.1421728Abstract
Introduction: The increase in ultra-processed foods (UPFs) intake has raised concerns about its impact on public health. Prospective observational studies have reported significant associations between higher intake of UPFs and adverse health outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine whether these associations could be confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We conducted a systematic review to analyze the evidence on the effects of UPFs intake on health. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, and CENTRAL up to April 22, 2024. RCTs in English, Spanish, and Portuguese evaluating the health effects of interventions to modify UPFs intake were included. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE methodology. Results: Three educational intervention studies and one controlled feeding trial were included, evaluating the effect of reducing the consumption of UPFs (455 participants, median follow-up, 12 weeks). No significant effects were observed in 30 out of the 42 outcomes evaluated. The controlled feeding trial in adults with stable weight showed a reduction in energy intake, carbohydrates, and fat (low certainty of evidence), as well as in body weight, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol (moderate certainty of evidence). In the educational intervention studies, a reduction in body weight and waist circumference was observed (low certainty of evidence) in women with obesity, as well as improvement in some dimensions of quality of life (very low certainty of evidence). No significant changes were observed in children and adolescents with obesity, while in overweight pregnant women, the consumption of UPFs was not reduced, so the observed benefits could be attributed to other components of the intervention. Conclusion: Interventions aimed at reducing the consumption of UPFs showed benefits on some anthropometric and dietary intake outcomes, although significant effects were not observed for most of the evaluated outcomes. The limited number and significant methodological limitations of the studies prevent definitive conclusions. Further well-designed and conducted RCTs are needed to understand the effects of UPF consumption on health. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023469984Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Language
engEISSN
2296861Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fnut.2024.1421728
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons


