Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Bonilla-Aldana, D. KatterineBonilla-Aldana, Jorge Luis
Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
Al-kassab-Córdova, Ali
Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
Alarcon-Braga, Esteban A.
Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
Copaja-Corzo, Cesar
Silva-Cajaleon, Kenneth
Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
Issue Date
2024-07-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier LtdJournal
Journal of Infection and Public HealthDOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2024.04.015Abstract
Mpox is a zoonotic disease that became epidemic in multiple countries in 2022. There is a lack of published systematic reviews on natural animal infection due to Mpox. We performed a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to assess animal Mpox prevalence. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for prevalence studies. After the screening, 15 reports were selected for full-text assessment and included in qualitative and quantitative analyses. Ten reports assessed Mpox infection by molecular or serological tests (n = 2680), yielding a pooled prevalence of 16.0% (95%CI: 3.0–29.0%) for non-human primates; 8.0% (95%CI: 4.0–12.0%) for rodents and 1.0% (95%CI: 0.0–3.0%) for shrews. Further studies in other animals are required to define the extent and importance of natural infection due to Mpox. These findings have implications for public human and animal health. OneHealth approach is critical for prevention and control.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessLanguage
engISSN
18760341EISSN
1876035Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2024.04.015
Scopus Count
Collections
