• English
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Artículos científicos
  • Pregrado
  • Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
  • Medicina
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Artículos científicos
  • Pregrado
  • Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
  • Medicina
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of UPCCommunitiesTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

Quick Guides

AcercaPolíticasPlantillas de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de otros documentosLista de verificación

Statistics

Display statistics

Mpox infection in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine
Bonilla-Aldana, Jorge Luis
Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
Al-kassab-Córdova, Ali
Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
Alarcon-Braga, Esteban A.
Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
Copaja-Corzo, Cesar
Silva-Cajaleon, Kenneth
Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
Issue Date
2024-07-01
Keywords
Animals
Mpox
Poxviridae
Prevalence
Transmission
Zoonotic

Metadata
Show full item record
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Journal
Journal of Infection and Public Health
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/675814
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2024.04.015
Abstract
Mpox is a zoonotic disease that became epidemic in multiple countries in 2022. There is a lack of published systematic reviews on natural animal infection due to Mpox. We performed a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to assess animal Mpox prevalence. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for prevalence studies. After the screening, 15 reports were selected for full-text assessment and included in qualitative and quantitative analyses. Ten reports assessed Mpox infection by molecular or serological tests (n = 2680), yielding a pooled prevalence of 16.0% (95%CI: 3.0–29.0%) for non-human primates; 8.0% (95%CI: 4.0–12.0%) for rodents and 1.0% (95%CI: 0.0–3.0%) for shrews. Further studies in other animals are required to define the extent and importance of natural infection due to Mpox. These findings have implications for public human and animal health. OneHealth approach is critical for prevention and control.
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Language
eng
ISSN
18760341
EISSN
1876035X
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2024.04.015
Scopus Count
Collections
Medicina

entitlement

 

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Alicia
La Referencia
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.