A systematic review and meta-analysis of bovine brucellosis seroprevalence in Latin America and the Caribbean
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Bonilla-Aldana, D. KatterineTrejos-Mendoza, Adrián Esteban
Pérez-Vargas, Soffia
Rivera-Casas, Estefany
Muñoz-Lara, Fausto
Zambrano, Lysien I.
Arteaga-Livias, Kovy
Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
Alarcon-Braga, Esteban A.
Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
Al-kassab-Córdova, Ali
Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
Issue Date
2023-09-01Keywords
BrucellosisCattle
Meta-analysis
Seroprevalence
Systematic review
Zoonotic
Bovine Brucellosis
Public Health
Latin America
Systematic Literature Review
Meta-analysis
Seroprevalence
Random-Effects Model
Geographical Variability
Zoonotic Implications
Disease Prevention Measures
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier LtdJournal
New Microbes and New InfectionsDOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101168Additional Links
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37692289/Abstract
Introduction: Bovine brucellosis is a significant public health problem in countries with economic and zoonotic implications. Although relevant, there are no previous systematic reviews about bovine brucellosis in Latin America. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review in five data-bases to assess the seroprevalence of Brucella in cattle. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). In addition, measures of heterogeneity (Cochran's Q statistic and I2 test) were reported. Results: The literature search yielded 3,403 articles, of which 65 studies were fully valid for analysis. The pooled seroprevalence for Brucella in bovine (n = 46,883,177) was 4.0% (95%CI: 3.0%–5.0%; p < 0.001), and Venezuela was the country with the highest prevalence (16.0%). By regions, the highest seroprevalence is in Central America and the Caribbean islands (8.0%,95%CI: 3.0%–15.0%; p < 0.001, I2 = 99.85). Conclusions: Some countries reported still relevant seroprevalences of bovine brucellosis, especially at the Central America and Caribbean islands. Multiple factors may influence the survival and spread of pathogens in the environment; farms located in regions bordering forest areas, in areas of difficult access to the veterinary service; extensive beef herds raised at pastures with different age and productive groups inter-mingled, and minimal concerns regarding hygiene practices and disease prevention measures. Bovine brucellosis has not been eliminated and needs to be considered with new tools for prevention and control, especially being a zoonosis.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanguage
engISSN
20522975Sponsors
Association of Pathology Chairsae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101168
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons


