An algorithm for obtaining the frequency and the times of respiratory phases from nasal and oral acoustic signals
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2023-02-01Keywords
Breathing rateBuccal sound
Envelope detection
Expiration time
Inspiration time
Nasal sound
Respiration
Computational algorithm
Respiratory phases
Buccal and nasal acoustic signal
Medical applications
Remote patient monitoring
Pulmonary pathologies
COVID-19
Signal acquisition
Signal processing techniques
Validation process and results
Metadata
Show full item recordJournal
International Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringDOI
10.11591/ijece.v13i1.pp358-373Additional Links
https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/view/27634Abstract
This work proposes a computational algorithm which extracts the frequency, timings and signal segments corresponding to respiratory phases, through buccal and nasal acoustic signal processing. The proposal offers a computational solution for medical applications which require on-site or remote patient monitoring and evaluation of pulmonary pathologies, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The state of the art presents a few respiratory evaluation proposals through buccal and nasal acoustic signals. Most proposals focus on respiratory signals acquired by a medical professional, using stethoscopes and electrodes located on the thorax. In this case the signal acquisition process is carried out through the use of a low cost and easy to use mask, which is equipped with strategically positioned and connected electret microphones, to maximize the proposed algorithm's performance. The algorithm employs signal processing techniques such as signal envelope detection, decimation, fast Fourier transform (FFT) and detection of peaks and time intervals via estimation of local maxima and minima in a signal's envelope. For the validation process a database of 32 signals of different respiratory modes and frequencies was used. Results show a maximum average error of 2.23% for breathing rate, 2.81% for expiration time and 3.47% for inspiration time.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Language
engISSN
20888708ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.11591/ijece.v13i1.pp358-373
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons