Oropouche virus infection in patients with acute febrile syndrome: Is a predictive model based solely on signs and symptoms useful?
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Durango-Chavez, Hilda V.Toro-Huamanchumo, Carlos J.
Silva-Caso, Wilmer
Martins-Luna, Johanna
Aguilar-Luis, Miguel Angel
del Valle-Mendoza, Juana
Puyen, Zully M.
Issue Date
2022-07-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Public Library of ScienceJournal
PLoS ONEDOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270294Additional Links
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35881626/Abstract
Background Oropouche fever is an infectious disease caused by the Oropouche virus (OROV). The diagnosis and prediction of the clinical picture continue to be a great challenge for clinicians who manage patients with acute febrile syndrome. Several symptoms have been associated with OROV virus infection in patients with febrile syndrome; however, to date, there is no clinical prediction rule, which is a fundamental tool to help the approach of this infectious disease. Objective To assess the performance of a prediction model based solely on signs and symptoms to diagnose Oropouche virus infection in patients with acute febrile syndrome. Materials and methods Validation study, which included 923 patients with acute febrile syndrome registered in the Epidemiological Surveillance database of three arbovirus endemic areas in Peru. Results A total of 97 patients (19%) were positive for OROV infection in the development group and 23.6% in the validation group. The area under the curve was 0.65 and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR + and LR- were 78.2%, 35.1%, 27.6%, 83.6%, 1.20 and 0.62, respectively. Conclusions The development of a clinical prediction model for the diagnosis of Oropouche based solely on signs and symptoms does not work well. This may be due to the fact that the symptoms are nonspecific and related to other arbovirus infections, which confuse and make it difficult to predict the diagnosis, especially in endemic areas of co-infection of these diseases. For this reason, epidemiological surveillance of OROV in various settings using laboratory tests such as PCR is important.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanguage
engEISSN
19326203ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270294
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons


