Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2022-02-11Keywords
ResilienciaEpilepsia idiopática
Amenazas al desarrollo
Factores protectores
Factores promovedores
Resilience
Idiopathic epilepsy
Threats to development
Protective factors
Promoting factors
Competencies
Metadata
Show full item recordOther Titles
Resilience in people with idiopathic epilepsyAbstract
El objetivo de la investigación es explorar la resiliencia en personas diagnosticadas con epilepsia idiopática. Para tal fin, se desarrolló un estudio cualitativo de diseño fenomenológico, aplicando la técnica de la entrevista semiestructurada a una muestra de 10 participantes, 6 mujeres y 4 hombres, cuyas edades se situaron en el rango de 20 a 29 años. Los principales resultados muestran que los sesgos personales, la estigmatización, el desconocimiento de la sociedad sobre la enfermedad, la falta de reconocimiento de los participantes sobre la participación en actividades riesgosas y la aversión a la adherencia al tratamiento y su relación con los recordatorios familiares, representan amenazas significativas. Por otro lado, como principales competencias se encuentran el apoyo familiar y el proceso de adaptación a la enfermedad. Las principales conclusiones son: (1) Se comprende que existen riesgos significativos para su autonomía, (2) se identifican factores que representan una protección frente a los posibles riesgos, (3) cuentan con factores protectores que facilitan el crecimiento personal.The aim of the research is to explore resilience in people diagnosed with idiopathic epilepsy. For this purpose, a qualitative study of phenomenological design was developed, applying the semi-structured interview technique to a sample of 10 participants, 6 women and 4 men, whose ages ranged between 20 to 29 years. The main results show that personal biases, stigmatization, unawareness by society about the disease, lack of recognition by participants about participation in risky activities and aversion to adherence to treatment and its relationship with family reminders represent significant threats. On the other hand, the main competences are family support and the process of adaptation to the disease. As conclusions: (1) It is understood that there are significant risks to their autonomy, (2) they have factors that represent a protection against possible risks, (3) they have protective factors that facilitate personal growth.
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Language
spaCollections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons