Vasoactive agents for the management of acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Huaringa-Marcelo, JorgeHuaman, Mariella R.
Brañez-Condorena, Ana
Villacorta-Landeo, Pamela
Pinto-Ruiz, Diego F.
Urday-Ipanaqué, Diana
García-Gomero, David
Montes-Teves, Pedro
Miranda, Adelina Lozano
Issue Date
2021-01-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Romanian Society of GastroenterologyJournal
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver DiseasesDOI
10.15403/jgld-3191Additional Links
https://www.jgld.ro/jgld/index.php/jgld/article/view/3191/1692Abstract
Background & Aims: Vasoactive agents with endoscopic therapy are used to treat acute variceal bleeding (AVB). There are two main groups of vasoactive agents: terlipressin and vasopressin (T-V), and octreotide and somatostatin (O-S). However, the benefit/harm balance is unclear. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of T-V versus O-S for the management of AVB. Methods: We performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL. Our main outcomes were mortality and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were bleeding control, rebleeding, blood transfusion, hospital stay. We evaluated the certainty of evidence using GRADE methodology. Results: We included 21 RCTs. The risk of mortality (RR: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.83-1.22), bleeding control (RR: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.91-1.02; I2=53%), early rebleeding (RR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.66-1.24: I2=0%), late rebleeding (RR: 0.94; 95 CI: 0.56-1.60; I2=0%), blood transfusion (MD: 0.04; 95%CI:-0.31-0.39; I2=68%) and hospital stay (MD:-1.06; 95%CI:-2.80-0.69; I2=0%) were similar between T-V and O-S groups. Only 15 studies reported adverse events, which were significantly higher in the T-V compared to the O-S group (RR 2.39; 95%CI: 1.58-3.63; I2=57%). The certainty of evidence was moderate for the main outcomes, and low or very low for others. Conclusions: In cirrhotic patients with AVB, those treated with T-V had similar mortality risk compared to O-S. However, the use of T-V showed an increased risk of adverse events compared to O-S.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Language
engISSN
18418724ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.15403/jgld-3191
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons


