Conductas de riesgo y representación de estilos de apego en adolescentes de un colegio limeño
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Advisors
Alarcón Parco, DanitsaIssue Date
2020-09-18Keywords
Representación del apegoConductas de riesgo
Estilos de apego
Conducta sexual
Adolescentes
Attachment representation
Risk behaviors
Attachment styles
Sexual conduct
Teenagers
Metadata
Show full item recordOther Titles
Risk behaviors and representation of attachment styles in adolescents from a school in LimaDOI
http://doi.org/10.19083/tesis/653195Abstract
El objetivo del presente trabajo es correlacionar las conductas de riesgo y representación de estilos de apego en adolescentes. La muestra estuvo conformada por 177 escolares cuyas edades oscilan entre 12 y 17 años. Los instrumentos empleados fueron el Cuestionario de Evaluación Cognitiva de Eventos de Riesgo (Fromme, Katz & Rivet, 1997) y la Versión Reducida del Cuestionario CaMir para la evaluación del apego adaptado a Perú (Valenzuela, 2014). Los resultados indican que se ha encontrado una correlación inversa, baja y significativa entre Seguridad: Disponibilidad y apoyo de figuras de apego con Conductas agresivas (r = -.189, p < .05), Conductas académicas irresponsables (r = -.199, p < .05) y Conductas sexuales de riesgo (r = -.149, p < .05).The purpose of this work was to correlate risk behaviors with the representative attachment styles among adolescents in a school in Lima. Participants were 177 adolescents ranging in age from 12 to 17 years. Two instruments were used to measure the variables: the CaMir-R (Valenzuela, 2014) and the CARE (Fromme, Katz & Rivet, 1997). The results showed that there is an inverse, low and significant correlation between Safety: Availability and attachment figure supports with Aggressive behaviors (r = -.189, p < .05), Irresponsible academic behaviors (r = -.199, p < .05) and Risky Sexual Behaviors (r = -.149, p < .05). On the other hand, there were significant, direct and low correlation between the factors.
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Language
spaae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://doi.org/10.19083/tesis/653195
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons