Standardisation of nailfold capillaroscopy for the assessment of patients with Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Smith, VanessaHerrick, Ariane L.
Ingegnoli, Francesca
Damjanov, Nemanja
De Angelis, Rossella
Denton, Christopher P.
Distler, Oliver
Espejo, Karinna
Foeldvari, Ivan
Frech, Tracy
Garro, Boris
Gutierrez, Marwin
Gyger, Genevieve
Hachulla, Eric
Hesselstrand, Roger
Iagnocco, Annamaria
Kayser, Cristiane
Melsens, Karin
Müller-Ladner, Ulf
Paolino, Sabrina
Pizzorni, Carmen
Radic, Mislav
Riccieri, Valeria
Snow, Marcus
Stevens, Wendy
Sulli, Alberto
van Laar, Jacob M.
Vonk, Madelon C.
Vanhaecke, Amber
Cutolo, Maurizio
Issue Date
2020-03-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Journal
Autoimmunity ReviewsDOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102458PubMed ID
31927087Additional Links
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156899722030001XAbstract
Capillaroscopy is a non-invasive and safe tool which allows the evaluation of the morphology of the microcirculation. Since its recent incorporation in the 2013 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis together with its assessed role to monitor disease progression, capillaroscopy became a ‘mainstream’ investigation for rheumatologists. Given its increasing use by a variety of physicians internationally both in daily practice to differentiate primary from secondary Raynaud's phenomenon, as well as in research context to predict disease progression and monitor treatment effects, standardisation in capillaroscopic image acquisition and analysis seems paramount. To step forward to this need, experts in the field of capillaroscopy/microcirculation provide in this very consensus paper their view on image acquisition and analysis, different capillaroscopic techniques, normal and abnormal capillaroscopic characteristics and their meaning, scoring systems and reliability of image acquisition and interpretation.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanguage
engSeries/Report no.
3ISSN
15689972ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102458
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons


