Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhunger, Monica*
dc.contributor.authorRakshit, Sagar*
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Adrian V.*
dc.contributor.authorPasupuleti, Vinay*
dc.contributor.authorGlass, Kate*
dc.contributor.authorGalsky, Matthew D.*
dc.contributor.authorGrivas, Petros*
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-01T16:06:23Z
dc.date.available2018-12-01T16:06:23Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1083-7159
dc.identifier.issn1549-490X
dc.identifier.doi10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/624716
dc.descriptionEl texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.es_PE
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical trial completion is critical for new cancer therapies. Premature trial termination or withdrawal is common and impairs progress. We assessed factors of early terminated/withdrawn oncology trials focusing on trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), hypothesizing that the latter may be associated with lower rates of premature discontinuation. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all adult, intervention, oncology trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (November 16, 2011, to April 16, 2015) to identify all terminated/withdrawn trials and reasons for termination. Logistics regression model was used to identify factors associated with early termination/withdrawal. Discontinuation rate was compared in trials with and without ICI. Results: We identified 12,875 trials (35% industry funded, 12% federal funded), of which 8.5% were prematurely terminated (5%) or withdrawn (3.5%); the main reasons were poor accrual (33%) and logistical (24%). ICI trials (n = 350) had a nonsignificant lower rate of termination or withdrawal compared with all other oncology trials (5.4% vs. 8.5%; p =.9) and were less likely to discontinue due to poor accrual (nonsignificant difference: 21% vs. 33%; p =.4). ICI trials were also less likely to discontinue compared with all other oncology drug trials (e.g., chemotherapy, targeted inhibitors, antiangiogenesis, biologics; 5.4% vs. 7.9%, respectively, nonsignificant difference). The 4-year cumulative incidence of failing to complete for reasons unrelated to toxicity or efficacy was 18% (95% confidence interval 16%–20%). There was no association between annual incidence across different tumor types or accrual goal and rate of trial termination. Conclusion: Poor accrual represents the main cause of early cancer trial termination. Premature termination/withdrawal rate was not significantly lower in ICI compared with other trials. Clinical trial completion remains a high priority and can be influenced by provider and patient factors. Implications for Practice: Clinical trial completion is critical for new cancer therapies. Premature trial termination or withdrawal is common and impairs progress. This study assessed factors of early terminated/withdrawn oncology trials, focusing on trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and found that poor accrual represents the main cause of early cancer trial termination. Premature termination/withdrawal rate was not significantly lower in immune checkpoint inhibitor trials compared to other trials. The discussion herein is focused on measures taken by the National Cancer Institute and other institutions to improve clinical trial accrual and prevent premature clinical trial discontinuation.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/lookup/doi/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0003en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.sourceUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)es_PE
dc.sourceRepositorio Academico - UPCes_PE
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectClinical trial terminationen_US
dc.subjectImmune checkpoint inhibitorsen_US
dc.subjectImmunotherapyen_US
dc.titlePremature clinical trial discontinuation in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitorsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewRevisión por pareses_PE
dc.contributor.email[email protected]es_PE
dc.source.journaltitleThe Oncologist
dc.source.beginpagetheoncologist.2018-0003
refterms.dateFOA2018-12-01T16:06:24Z
dc.identifier.isni0000 0001 2196 144X


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10.1634theoncologist.2018-0003.pdf
Size:
179.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record