The role of B-type natriuretic peptide in diagnosing acute decompensated heart failure in chronic kidney disease patients
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Autor
Kadri, Amer N.Kaw, Roop
Al-Khadra, Yasser
Abumasha, Hasan
Ravakhah, Keyvan
Hernandez, Adrian V.
Tang, Wai Hong Wilson
Fecha de publicación
2018Palabras clave
Acute decompensated heart failureB-type natriuretic peptide
Chronic kidney disease
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Acute heart failure
xmlui.metadata.dc.contributor.email
[email protected]
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Termedia Publishing House Ltd.Journal
Archives of Medical ScienceDOI
10.5114/aoms.2018.77263Enlaces adicionales
https://www.termedia.pl/doi/10.5114/aoms.2018.77263Resumen
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and congestive heart failure (CHF) patients have higher serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), which alters the test interpretation. We aim to define BNP cutoff levels to diagnose acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in CKD according to CHF subtype: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Material and methods: We reviewed 1,437 charts of consecutive patients who were admitted for dyspnea. We excluded patients with normal kidney function, without measured BNP, echocardiography, or history of CHF. BNP cutoff values to diagnose ADHF for CKD stages according to CHF subtype were obtained for the highest pair of sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp). We calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR–, respectively), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), as well as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for BNP. Results: We evaluated a cohort of 348 consecutive patients: 152 had ADHF, and 196 had stable CHF. In those with HFpEF with CKD stages 3–4, BNP < 155 pg/ml rules out ADHF (Sn90%, LR– = 0.26 and DOR = 5.75), and BNP > 670 pg/ml rules in ADHF (Sp90%, LR+ = 4 and DOR = 6), with an AUC = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71–0.87). In contrast, in those with HFrEF with CKD stages 3–4, BNP < 412.5 pg/ml rules out ADHF (Sn90%, LR– = 0.19 and DOR = 9.37), and BNP > 1166.5 pg/ml rules in ADHF (Sp87%, LR+ = 3.9 and DOR = 6.97) with an AUC = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69–0.86). All LRs and DOR were statistically significant. Conclusions: BNP cutoff values for the diagnosis of ADHF in HFrEF were higher than those in HFpEF across CKD stages 3–4, with moderate discriminatory diagnostic ability.Tipo
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleDerechos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Idioma
engISSN
1734-1922ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.5114/aoms.2018.77263
Scopus Count
Colecciones
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia:
- Creative Commons
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess