Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoman, Yuani M.*
dc.contributor.authorDominguez, Mariah C.*
dc.contributor.authorEasow, Tommy M.*
dc.contributor.authorPasupuleti, Vinay*
dc.contributor.authorWhite, C. Michael*
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Adrian V.*
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-27T02:52:34Z
dc.date.available2018-11-27T02:52:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0307-0565
dc.identifier.issn1476-5497
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0204-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/624649
dc.descriptionEl texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.es_PE
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intermittent dieting may be an alternative to continuous dieting for weight reduction. Objective: To evaluate the effect of intermittent dieting versus continuous dieting on weight and body composition in overweight or obese adults. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five databases were searched until February 2018 for RCTs comparing intermittent versus continuous dieting. Intermittent dieting consisted of two types: regular intermittent was caloric restriction interspersed with days of weight maintenance or ad libitum eating; intensified intermittent was caloric restriction interspersed with days of even lower caloric restriction. Continuous was continual caloric restriction. Primary outcomes were weight, body fat, lean mass, waist circumference, hip circumference, and energy expenditure. Data were pooled by the inverse variance method using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Nine trials met the inclusion criteria (n = 782), six comparing regular intermittent vs continuous (n = 553), and three comparing intensified intermittent vs continuous (n = 229). Populations were heterogeneous: obese only in five studies, and overweight or obese (mixed) in four studies. Lean mass was significantly lower in regular intermittent vs continuous (MD −0.86 kg; 95% CI −1.62 to −0.10; p = 0.03). No differences were found for the remaining outcomes for both comparisons (regular intermittent or intensified intermittent vs continuous). There was low heterogeneity of effects across trials. Subgroup effects by time to follow-up, gender, per-protocol versus intention-to-treat, enforced exercise, and diabetes were similar to main analyses. Conclusions: This systematic review in obese and overweight individuals showed that regular intermittent dieting decreased lean mass compared to continuous dieting. There were no differences in effects for either intermittent vs continuous interventions across all other outcomes. In contrast to previous systematic reviews, this study suggested that lean mass is better preserved in continuous dieting compared to regular intermittent dieting.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-018-0204-0en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.sourceUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)es_PE
dc.sourceRepositorio Academico - UPCes_PE
dc.titleEffects of intermittent versus continuous dieting on weight and body composition in obese and overweight people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Obesityen_US
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a662
dc.description.peerreviewRevisión por pareses_PE
dc.contributor.emailadrian.hernandez-diaz@uconn.edues_PE
dc.source.journaltitleInternational Journal of Obesity
refterms.dateFOA2018-11-27T02:56:36Z
dc.identifier.isni0000 0001 2196 144X


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10.1038 s41366-018-0204-0.pdf
Size:
208.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record