Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZegarra-Baquerizo, Hugo*
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Sékula, Katica*
dc.contributor.authorCasas-Apayco, Leslie*
dc.contributor.authorGhersi-Miranda, Hugo*
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-20T14:24:27Z
dc.date.available2017-11-20T14:24:27Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-26
dc.identifier.citationMandibular condyle dimensions in Peruvian patients with Class II and Class III skeletal patterns. 2017, 6 (10):264 Journal of Oral Researches
dc.identifier.issn07192460
dc.identifier.issn07192479
dc.identifier.doi10.17126/joralres.2017.077
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/622425
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare condylar dimensions of young adults with Class II and Class III skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: 124 CBCTs from 18-30 year-old patients, divided into 2 groups according to skeletal patterns (Class II and Class III) were evaluated. Skeletal patterns were classified by measuring the ANB angle of each patient. The anteroposterior diameter (A and P) of the right and left mandibular condyle was assessed from a sagittal view by a line drawn from point A (anterior) to P (posterior). The coronal plane allowed the evaluation of the medio-lateral diameter by drawing a line from point M (medium) to L (lateral); all distances were measured in mm. Results: In Class II the A-P diameter was 9.06±1.33 and 8.86±1.56 for the right and left condyles respectively, in Class III these values were 8.71±1.2 and 8.84±1.42. In Class II the M-L diameter was 17.94±2.68 and 17.67±2.44 for the right and left condyles respectively, in Class III these values were 19.16±2.75 and 19.16±2.54. Conclusion: Class III M-L dimensions showed higher values than Class II, whereas these differences were minimal in A-P.
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherUniversidad de Concepciones
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/366/351es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.sourceUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)es_PE
dc.sourceRepositorio Académico - UPCes_PE
dc.subjectCondyle dimensiones
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomographyes
dc.subjectMandibular condylees
dc.subjectSkeletal patternes
dc.titleMandibular condyle dimensions in Peruvian patients with Class II and Class III skeletal patterns.es
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Oral Researches
dc.description.peerreviewRevisión por pareses_PE
dc.contributor.emailleslie.casas@upc.pees_PE
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-19T04:31:55Z
html.description.abstractObjective: To compare condylar dimensions of young adults with Class II and Class III skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: 124 CBCTs from 18-30 year-old patients, divided into 2 groups according to skeletal patterns (Class II and Class III) were evaluated. Skeletal patterns were classified by measuring the ANB angle of each patient. The anteroposterior diameter (A and P) of the right and left mandibular condyle was assessed from a sagittal view by a line drawn from point A (anterior) to P (posterior). The coronal plane allowed the evaluation of the medio-lateral diameter by drawing a line from point M (medium) to L (lateral); all distances were measured in mm. Results: In Class II the A-P diameter was 9.06±1.33 and 8.86±1.56 for the right and left condyles respectively, in Class III these values were 8.71±1.2 and 8.84±1.42. In Class II the M-L diameter was 17.94±2.68 and 17.67±2.44 for the right and left condyles respectively, in Class III these values were 19.16±2.75 and 19.16±2.54. Conclusion: Class III M-L dimensions showed higher values than Class II, whereas these differences were minimal in A-P.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
366-1382-3-PBB.pdf
Size:
289.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record