Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Carnero, Andres M.Mayta-Tristan, Percy
Konda, Kelika A.
Mezones-Holguín, Edward
Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
Alvarado, German F.
Canelo Aybar, Carlos
Maguiña, Jorge L.
Segura, Eddy R.
Quispe, Antonio M.
Smith, Edward S.
Bayer, Angela M.
Lescano, Andres G.
Issue Date
2016-11-15xmlui.metadata.dc.contributor.email
[email protected]
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru 2016 Science and Engineering EthicsPublisher
Springer International PublishingJournal
Science and Engineering EthicsDOI
10.1007/s11948-016-9820-zAdditional Links
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-016-9820-zAbstract
Plagiarism is a serious, yet widespread type of research misconduct, and is often neglected in developing countries. Despite its far-reaching implications, plagiarism is poorly acknowledged and discussed in the academic setting, and insufficient evidence exists in Latin America and developing countries to inform the development of preventive strategies. In this context, we present a longitudinal case study of seven instances of plagiarism and cheating arising in four consecutive classes (2011–2014) of an Epidemiology Masters’ program in Lima, Peru, and describe the implementation and outcomes of a multifaceted, “zero-tolerance” policy aimed at introducing research integrity. Two cases involved cheating in graded assignments, and five cases correspond to plagiarism in the thesis protocol. Cases revealed poor awareness and high tolerance to plagiarism, poor academic performance, and widespread writing deficiencies, compensated with patchwriting and copy-pasting. Depending on the events’ severity, penalties included course failure (6/7) and separation from the program (3/7). Students at fault did not engage in further plagiarism. Between 2011 and 2013, the Masters’ program sequentially introduced a preventive policy consisting of: (i) intensified research integrity and scientific writing education, (ii) a stepwise, cumulative writing process; (iii) honor codes; (iv) active search for plagiarism in all academic products; and (v) a “zero tolerance” policy in response to documented cases. No cases were detected in 2014. In conclusion, plagiarism seems to be widespread in resource-limited settings and a greater response with educational and zero-tolerance components is needed to prevent it.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanguage
engISSN
1353-34521471-5546
Sponsors
This study was funded by the training Grant 2D43 TW007393-06 awarded to the U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6) by the Fogarty International Center of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s11948-016-9820-z
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons


