• English
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Tesis
  • Pregrado
  • Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
  • Odontologia
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Tesis
  • Pregrado
  • Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
  • Odontologia
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of UPCCommunitiesTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsAdvisorIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

Quick Guides

AcercaPolíticasPlantillas de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de tesis y trabajos de investigaciónFormato de publicación de otros documentosLista de verificación

Statistics

Display statistics

Comparación in vitro de la cantidad de debris apical extruido tras la utilización de una técnica manual, un sistema rotatorio y un reciprocante

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
Tesis original.pdf
Size:
1.238Mb
Format:
PDF
Download
Thumbnail
Name:
Tesis original.epub
Size:
1.945Mb
Format:
application/epub
Download
Thumbnail
Name:
Chiarella_ms.doc
Embargo:
2085-11-07
Size:
69.33Mb
Format:
Microsoft Word
Download
Thumbnail
Name:
Formato de autorización Chiarella ...
Embargo:
2085-11-07
Size:
1.461Mb
Format:
PDF
Download
View more filesView fewer files
Average rating
 
   votes
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
 
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Chiarella Montoya, Sara Grecia
Advisors
Vertiz Falla, Augusto Rensso
Issue Date
07/11/2015
Keywords
Extrusión ortodóncica
Instrumentos dentales
Odontología
Tesis
Local subject classification
Instrumentación rotatoria
Extrusión del debris apical
Reciproc

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Chiarella Montoya SG. Comparación in vitro de la cantidad de debris apical extruido tras la utilización de una técnica manual, un sistema rotatorio y un reciprocante [Internet]. Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC; 2015 [cited 2016 May 5]. Available from: http://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/upc/handle/10757/581920
Publisher
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/581920
Abstract
Objective: Compare in vitro the weight of extruded apical debris using a manual technique, a Protaper® rotary systems and Reciproc® reciprocating in single rooted premolars. Materials and methods: An experimental type of research have been done in vitro, for wish sixty human single rooted premolar with similar characteristics, divided on three groups. Depending on the type of instrumentation the groups were divided on (n=20) manual step back, Protaper® y Reciproc® respect. Instrumentation have been done on each group agreed with the instructions of the fabricant. Independent on every technique, each one of them were irrigated with 1 ml of distillated water. The weight of collected debris was extruded using the method modified by Myers and Montgomery in 1991. Subsequently the sample is placed into the incubator (Gravity Convection Incubator, Model Economy 2EG) at 37° C for seven days. After the debris was weighed using an electronic balance (Balance Electronics Denver Instrument M-220D) with an accuracy of <0.0001 g. Results: Reciproc® produced less debris 0.0010 compared with other systems. No statistically significant difference was observed between the manual techniques and the Protaper® (p=0.1939). At the time to compare the three manual systems Step back, Protaper® and Reciproc®, statistically differences were found (p=0.0001) respect from the quantity of debris extruded. Conclusions: Every technique of instrumentation produces extrusion of the debris. This extrusion to the periapical region can cause inflammation and flare up after the treatment and can cause sings, however it depends of the quantity of debris extruded. In the present study the Protaper® extruded significantly more quantity of apical debris that the one in the instrumentation with Reciproc® and manual.
Objetivo: comparar in vitro el peso del debris apical extruido, utilizando una técnica manual step back, un sistema rotatorio Protaper® y un reciprocante Reciproc® en premolares de un solo conducto. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio tipo experimental in vitro, para lo cual se necesitó 60 piezas humanas premolares de un solo conducto y similares características, divididas en tres grupos. Según el tipo de instrumentación, los grupo fueron divididos en (n=20) manual Step Back, Protaper® y Reciproc®, respectivamente. Se procedió a instrumentar cada grupo de acuerdo a las instrucciones del fabricante. Independientemente de cada técnica, todos se irrigaron con 1 ml de agua destilada. El peso del debris extruido fue recolectado usando el método de Myers and Montgomery, en 1991. Seguidamente, las muestras se colocaron en la incubadora a 37°C por siete días. Después, el debris fue pesado usando una balanza electrónica con una precisión de < 0.0001 g. Resultados: el Reciproc® produjo menor debris 0.0010 comparado con los otros sistemas. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas al comparar la técnica manual con el Protaper® (p= 0.1939). Al comparar los tres sistemas manual Step Back, Protaper® y Reciproc® se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p=0.0001) con respecto a la cantidad de debris extruido. Conclusiones: todas las técnicas de instrumentación producen extrusión del debris. Esta extrusión hacia la región periapical puede causar inflamación y flare up, después del tratamiento de endodoncia, y causar sintomatologías. Sin embargo, dependerá de la cantidad de debris extruida. En el presente estudio el Protaper® extruyó significativamente mayor cantidad de debris apical que la instrumentación con Reciproc® y manual.
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Language
spa
Collections
Odontologia

entitlement

 

DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Alicia
La Referencia
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.