Accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review
Nombre:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Autor
Lloyd, AaronPasupuleti, Vinay
Thota, Priyaleela
Pant, Chaitanya
Rolston, David D.K
Hernández, Adrian V.
Benítes-Zapata, Vicente A.
Fraser, Thomas G.
Donskey, Curtis J.
Deshpande, Abhishek
Fecha de publicación
2015-02-24
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemCitation
Lloyd A, Pasupuleti V, Thota P, Pant C, Rolston DDK, Hernandez A V., et al. Accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2015;81. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0732889315000437Editorial
Elsevier B.V.Journal
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious DiseaseDOI
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.02.007Enlaces adicionales
http://ezproxy.concytec.gob.pe:2063/science/article/pii/S0732889315000437Resumen
Loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) are currently used as standalone diagnostic test for C. difficile infection (CDI). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for the diagnosis of CDI. We searched 5 databases to identify studies that compared LAMP with culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay or anaerobic toxigenic culture (TC) of C. difficile. We used the random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The search of the databases yielded 16 studies (6,979 samples) that met inclusion criteria. When TC was used as the gold standard (6,572 samples), bivariate analysis yielded a mean sensitivity of 0.95 (95%CI, 0.93-0.97; I2 = 67.4) and a mean specificity of 0.99 (95%CI, 0.96-1.00; I2 = 97.0). LAMP is a useful diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting CDI. The results should however be interpreted only in the presence of clinical suspicion and symptoms of CDI.Tipo
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleDerechos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIdioma
engISSN
0732-8893ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.02.007
Scopus Count
Colecciones
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia: