Influencia de las redes sociales y la prensa escrita en las elecciones presidenciales de 2016 en Perú: Análisis de la cobertura periodística de los diarios Expreso y Diario Uno sobre la manifestación del colectivo “No a Keiko” previo a la segunda vuelta electoral
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2019-11-28Keywords
Periodismo políticoElecciones presidenciales
Redes sociales
Political journalism
Presidential election
Social networks
Metadata
Show full item recordOther Titles
Influence of social networks and the written press in the presidential elections in Peru in 2016: Analysis of the journalistic coverage of Expreso and Diario Uno newspapers on the manifestation of the “No a Keiko” collective prior to the second electoral roundAbstract
El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la cobertura periodística de los diarios Expreso y Diario Uno sobre la manifestación en contra de Keiko Fujimori previo a la segunda vuelta electoral en 2016. Se conoce que ambos periódicos presentan una línea editorial opuesta entre ellos. Se utilizó como método el análisis de contenido de una muestra de 32 notas que salieron entre el día del anuncio de la marcha, la fecha en la que se llevó a cabo y el día posterior a este. Como resultado se encontró que Expreso dedicó menos espacio a informar sobre este hecho y solo lo mencionó por medio de la participación de Pedro Pablo Kuckzynski. En cuanto a Diario Uno, el tono con el que trató este hecho noticioso se caracterizó por ser favorable, además de brindarle espacio a fuentes cercanas al colectivo “No a Keiko”, principal promotor de la manifestación.The purpose of this article is to analyze the journalistic coverage of the Expreso and Diario Uno newspapers on a demonstration against Keiko Fujimori prior to the second round of elections in 2016. It is known that both newspapers have an opposite editorial line between them. The content analysis of a sample of 32 notes that came out between the day of the anouncement of the protest, the protest, the day it was realized and the day after it. As a result, it was found that Expreso dedicated less space to report on this fact and only mentioned it through the participation of Pedro Pablo Kuckzynski. As for Diario Uno, the tone with which it dealt with this news event was characterized by being favourable, in addition to providing space to closer sources of the collective “No a Keiko”, the main promoter of the demonstration.
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Language
spaCollections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons