Effect of simulated intraoral erosion and/or abrasion effects on etch-and-rinse bonding to enamel.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Wang, LindaCasas-Apayco, Leslie
Hipólito, Ana Carolina
Dreibi, Vanessa Manzini
Giacomini, Marina Ciccone
Bim Júnior, Odair
Rios, Daniela
Magalhães, Ana Carolina
Issue Date
2014-02MeSH
Acid Etching, DentalAnimals
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
Carbonated Beverages
Cattle
Composite Resins
Dental Bonding
Dental Enamel
Dental Materials
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Humans
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Phosphoric Acids
Stress, Mechanical
Surface Properties
Tensile Strength
Time Factors
Tooth Abrasion
Tooth Erosion
Toothbrushing
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Effect of simulated intraoral erosion and/or abrasion effects on etch-and-rinse bonding to enamel. 2014, 27 (1):29-34 Am J DentPublisher
American Journal of DentistryJournal
American journal of dentistry (Am J Dent)PubMed ID
24902402Additional Links
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902402Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the influence of simulated oral erosive/abrasive challenges on the bond strength of an etch-and-rinse two-step bonding system to enamel using an in situ/ex vivo protocol. METHODS: Bovine enamel blocks were prepared and randomly assigned to four groups: CONT - control (no challenge), ABR - 3x/day-1 minute toothbrushing; ERO - 3x/day - 5 minutes extraoral immersion into regular Coca Cola; and ERO+ABR - erosive protocol followed by a 1-minute toothbrushing. Eight blocks were placed into an acrylic palatal appliance for each volunteer (n = 13), who wore the appliance for 5 days. Two blocks were subjected to each of the four challenges. Subsequently, all the blocks were washed with tap water and Adper Single Bond 2/Filtek Z350 were placed. After 24 hours, 1 mm2 beams were obtained from each block to be tested with the microtensile bond strength test (50 N load at 0.5 mm/minute). The data were statistically analyzed by one-way RM-ANOVA and Tukey's tests (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: No difference was detected among the ABR, ERO, and CONT groups (P > 0.05). ERO+ABR group yielded lower bond strengths than either the ABR and ERO groups (P < 0.0113).Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessLanguage
engDescription
El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.ISSN
0894-8275Collections
Related articles
- Enamel-resin bond durability of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesives.
- Authors: Osorio R, Monticelli F, Moreira MA, Osorio E, Toledano M
- Issue date: 2009 Dec
- The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.
- Authors: Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA
- Issue date: 2009 Nov
- Effect of enamel etching time on roughness and bond strength.
- Authors: Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Kimmes NS, Latta MA, Wilwerding TM
- Issue date: 2009 Mar-Apr
- Erosive cola-based drinks affect the bonding to enamel surface: an in vitro study.
- Authors: Casas-Apayco LC, Dreibi VM, Hipólito AC, Graeff MS, Rios D, Magalhães AC, Buzalaf MA, Wang L
- Issue date: 2014 Sep-Oct
- Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesive.
- Authors: Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Gomes G
- Issue date: 2011 Aug