A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Nahsan, Flavia Pardo SalataWang, Linda
Modena, Karin Silva
Francisconi Dos Rios, Luciana Fàvaro
Silva, Luciana Mendonça da
Calabria, Marcela Pagani
Casas-Apayco, Leslie
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Issue Date
2016-03Keywords
US Public Health Service criteriaComposite resin
Surface-penetrating sealant
Class I restoration
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations., 64 (2):18-20 Gen DentPublisher
Chicago, Academy of General DentistryJournal
General dentistry (Gen Dent.)PubMed ID
26943083Additional Links
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943083Abstract
A split-mouth, double-blind trial evaluated the effects of a surface sealant on the clinical performance of Class I composite resin restorations. In 16 patients, 27 pairs of maxillary and mandibular molars or premolars with Class I carious lesions or unsatisfactory restorations were restored with composite resin. For each pair, 1 surface was sealed with surface sealant. Clinical evaluations of marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, anatomical form, and secondary caries were performed by 2 experienced operators using modified US Public Health Service criteria 1-2 weeks and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Data were analyzed with the McNemar test (P < 0.05). After 6 months, only 1 (4%) sealed restoration presented a Bravo rating for marginal integrity. After 12 months, the Bravo ratings for marginal integrity were 2 (7%) for sealed restorations and 1 (4%) for nonsealed restorations. Restorations received a score of Alfa for all other parameters at all time periods. There were no statistically significant differences within or between the sealed and nonsealed groups (P = 1.0). The use of a surface sealant did not improve the clinical performance of posterior composite resin Class I restorations.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessLanguage
engDescription
El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.ISSN
0363-6771Collections