A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/607232
Title:
A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations.
Authors:
Nahsan, Flavia Pardo Salata; Wang, Linda; Modena, Karin Silva; Francisconi Dos Rios, Luciana Fàvaro; Silva, Luciana Mendonça da; Calabria, Marcela Pagani; Casas Apayco, Leslie Caroll; Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Citation:
A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations., 64 (2):18-20 Gen Dent
Publisher:
Chicago, Academy of General Dentistry
Journal:
General dentistry (Gen Dent.)
Issue Date:
Mar-2016
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10757/607232
PubMed ID:
26943083
Additional Links:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943083
Abstract:
A split-mouth, double-blind trial evaluated the effects of a surface sealant on the clinical performance of Class I composite resin restorations. In 16 patients, 27 pairs of maxillary and mandibular molars or premolars with Class I carious lesions or unsatisfactory restorations were restored with composite resin. For each pair, 1 surface was sealed with surface sealant. Clinical evaluations of marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, anatomical form, and secondary caries were performed by 2 experienced operators using modified US Public Health Service criteria 1-2 weeks and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Data were analyzed with the McNemar test (P < 0.05). After 6 months, only 1 (4%) sealed restoration presented a Bravo rating for marginal integrity. After 12 months, the Bravo ratings for marginal integrity were 2 (7%) for sealed restorations and 1 (4%) for nonsealed restorations. Restorations received a score of Alfa for all other parameters at all time periods. There were no statistically significant differences within or between the sealed and nonsealed groups (P = 1.0). The use of a surface sealant did not improve the clinical performance of posterior composite resin Class I restorations.
Type:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights:
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Language:
eng
Description:
El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.
Keywords:
US Public Health Service criteria; Composite resin; Surface-penetrating sealant; Class I restoration
ISSN:
0363-6771

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorNahsan, Flavia Pardo Salataes_PE
dc.contributor.authorWang, Lindaes_PE
dc.contributor.authorModena, Karin Silvaes_PE
dc.contributor.authorFrancisconi Dos Rios, Luciana Fàvaroes_PE
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Luciana Mendonça daes_PE
dc.contributor.authorCalabria, Marcela Paganies_PE
dc.contributor.authorCasas Apayco, Leslie Carolles_PE
dc.contributor.authorMondelli, Rafael Francisco Liaes_PE
dc.creatorUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)es_PE
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-27T20:50:40Zes_PE
dc.date.available2016-04-27T20:50:40Zes_PE
dc.date.issued2016-03es_PE
dc.identifier.citationA 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations., 64 (2):18-20 Gen Dentes_PE
dc.identifier.issn0363-6771es_PE
dc.identifier.pmid26943083es_PE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/607232es_PE
dc.descriptionEl texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado.es_PE
dc.description.abstractA split-mouth, double-blind trial evaluated the effects of a surface sealant on the clinical performance of Class I composite resin restorations. In 16 patients, 27 pairs of maxillary and mandibular molars or premolars with Class I carious lesions or unsatisfactory restorations were restored with composite resin. For each pair, 1 surface was sealed with surface sealant. Clinical evaluations of marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, anatomical form, and secondary caries were performed by 2 experienced operators using modified US Public Health Service criteria 1-2 weeks and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Data were analyzed with the McNemar test (P < 0.05). After 6 months, only 1 (4%) sealed restoration presented a Bravo rating for marginal integrity. After 12 months, the Bravo ratings for marginal integrity were 2 (7%) for sealed restorations and 1 (4%) for nonsealed restorations. Restorations received a score of Alfa for all other parameters at all time periods. There were no statistically significant differences within or between the sealed and nonsealed groups (P = 1.0). The use of a surface sealant did not improve the clinical performance of posterior composite resin Class I restorations.es_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isoenges_PE
dc.publisherChicago, Academy of General Dentistryes_PE
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943083es_PE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_PE
dc.sourceUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)es_PE
dc.sourceRepositorio Académico - UPCes_PE
dc.subjectUS Public Health Service criteriaes_PE
dc.subjectComposite resines_PE
dc.subjectSurface-penetrating sealantes_PE
dc.subjectClass I restorationes_PE
dc.titleA 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations.es_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_PE
dc.identifier.journalGeneral dentistry (Gen Dent.)es_PE
dc.description.peer-reviewRevisión por pareses_PE

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in UPC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.